Thursday, March 01, 2007
BAD NEWS POSSIBLY GETS LESS BAD
SI.com is reporting that, in August of 2004, Gary Matthews Jr. was sent human growth hormone in care of a friend and former minor league teammate. (That is the current extent of the allegations -- not that he used, but it was sent to him -- though as a practical matter it's hard to imagine someone ordering human growth hormone and not using it, even assuming these allegations have basis in fact.)
How is this possibly less bad?
Well, in 2004, human growth hormone was not banned by Major League Baseball; the ban began in 2005.
IF Matthews took HGH in 2004 only, he would not have been in violation of any major league rules. We have yet to hear reports that he may have been sent any such substances in subsequent seasons. What's more, the notion that his career year in 2006 might have been fueled by PED would lose traction IF we were to find out that any usage on his part was also taking place over his two prior seasons.
There is still vastly more about this story we don't know than we do know, of course, and I do not wish to jump to any sort of conclusions at this juncture. I'm just examining possibilities based on the allegations put forward in the media.
SI.com is reporting that, in August of 2004, Gary Matthews Jr. was sent human growth hormone in care of a friend and former minor league teammate. (That is the current extent of the allegations -- not that he used, but it was sent to him -- though as a practical matter it's hard to imagine someone ordering human growth hormone and not using it, even assuming these allegations have basis in fact.)
How is this possibly less bad?
Well, in 2004, human growth hormone was not banned by Major League Baseball; the ban began in 2005.
IF Matthews took HGH in 2004 only, he would not have been in violation of any major league rules. We have yet to hear reports that he may have been sent any such substances in subsequent seasons. What's more, the notion that his career year in 2006 might have been fueled by PED would lose traction IF we were to find out that any usage on his part was also taking place over his two prior seasons.
There is still vastly more about this story we don't know than we do know, of course, and I do not wish to jump to any sort of conclusions at this juncture. I'm just examining possibilities based on the allegations put forward in the media.
Labels: Applied Pharmacy, Gary Matthews Jr, Signature Pharmacy, steroids
Comments:
It's getting to the point where if a player becomes exceptionally good from one year to another he is thought to be on steroids or HGH. Sure some players are using, but to be constantly accusing is giving the players the short end of the stick. Come join this baseball message board and make a new topic or join some good discussions
You know. I hate it when the bring of the fact of HGH being "banned" or not by Major League Baseball.
The fact is, taking this stuff without prescritpion is against the law. So when does Major League Baseball policies prevail over law? Illegal is illegal.
Post a Comment
The fact is, taking this stuff without prescritpion is against the law. So when does Major League Baseball policies prevail over law? Illegal is illegal.
